In this conversation with Jacqueline Cheong at Artie, we learn why 95% of real-time streaming projects fail despite its importance in the age of AI.
Jaqueline also shares the sales playbook she learned during YC, how they got all their early enterprise customers through cold emails, building their own AI sales automations (Artie has no BDRs!), and getting customers to switch to Artie even after spending millions building the same product in-house.
We also go inside Artieâs recent $12 million Series A and what itâs like working with Standard Capital, a new firm started by three ex-YC partners.
I talked to a dozen people to prepare for this conversation, including Jared Friedman at YC, Jaquelineâs sales coach Rasanath Das, and numerous Artie employees like Anirudh Sriram, Ryan Choi, Sarah Berkin, MBA, Shangbing Jiang, and Jacquelineâs co-founder Robin Tang.
Support this Episodeâs Sponsors
Numeral: The end-to-end platform for sales tax and compliance.
Flex: Sign-up for Flex Elite with code TURNER, get $1,000. Apply here.
To inquire about sponsoring future episodes, click here.
đ Stream on Spotify and Apple
Timestamps to jump in:
4:08 Artie: Real-time data streaming
5:13 Why moving data is so hard
9:14 Evolution of data warehouses
12:47 AI needs real-time data
18:44 Build vs buy in data streaming
22:51 How to build in a crowded market
26:26 Early focus on a specific hard problem
30:33 Acquiring enterprise customers from cold emails
32:51 Onboarding their first customer with no UI
35:46 Solving compliance and implementation
38:50 How to automate internal engineering, marketing, and ops
44:01 Building an AI-powered GTM pipeline and motion
53:00 Starting Artie to solve their own problem
59:25 Discovering YC through a friend
1:02:20 Everything Jacqueline learned about sales
1:06:29 How to improve your sales discovery calls
1:10:08 Inside Artieâs $12m Series A
1:16:44 What its like working with Standard Capital
1:22:59 Jacquelineâs favorite book
Referenced:
Founding Sales (Book)
Find Jacqueline on X / Twitter and LinkedIn
Related Episodes
đ Stream on YouTube, Spotify, and Apple
Transcript
Find transcripts of all prior episodes here.
Turner Novak:
Jacqueline, welcome to the show.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, thanks for having me.
Turner Novak:
Real quick, for people who donât know, on your shirt, it says Artie, but what is Artie?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, so Artie is a real-time data streaming platform. So in a nutshell, what we do is we help companies move data across their systems in real time. And a very simple example is moving data from Postgres to Snowflake.
Turner Novak:
And why is that a big deal? That seems like not, something that seems like that consequential. Why is it such a big deal?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. So I mean, companies have different data stores. Thereâs operational data stores and then thereâs analytical data stores and they were built for very different use cases. So you have all your transactional data that lands in your operational database, but maybe you want to join it with other data, you want to analyze it, run machine learning models on it, build customer-facing analytical products and query that data that belongs in a analytical data store. So how do you get data into the analytical data store? Thatâs the problem that we solve.
Turner Novak:
Canât you just switch up how the dataâs stored initially? And again, it seems like maybe... Why is this such a big deal?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Itâs like a-
Turner Novak:
So no oneâs built this or?
Jacqueline Cheong:
It feels like a deceptively simple thing.
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Can I just copy and paste files into-
Turner Novak:
Yeah. It seems like it. Itâs just data. Copy and paste it.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. I think why itâs so hard is fundamentally, youâre moving data between heterogeneous systems. So a Postgres database is built differently than a Snowflake.
Turner Novak:
So you cannot just copy and paste it?
Jacqueline Cheong:
No, no. Just the different data types that they allow. There are restrictions on character length. And then so when youâre moving that data, thereâs very small conversions that actually have to happen such that you can land that data into Snowflake and have it still be usable. So thereâs a lot of complications. And then as you build this system out itâs, how do I make sure the data thatâs copied over is accurate? How do I make sure thereâs no missing data that was dropped along the way?
Turner Novak:
How do you get missing data? Itâs just data that gets dropped in a copy paste or?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, you skipped it. You skipped it because itâs not a data type that Snowflake allows. You donât know what to do with it and the system drops it or you didnât pick it up properly or it was written out of order. And then as you scale it out in production, the edge cases continue to build on each other.
Turner Novak:
So how big is this system that someone might be using? Is there 100 rows in a spreadsheet and-
Jacqueline Cheong:
No, no.
Turner Novak:
... itâs like how big do these-
Jacqueline Cheong:
I mean, transactional systems can be tens and hundreds of terabytes, can be petabytes big. And when we talk about the data thatâs moving, weâre only moving the data that has changed. So itâs not the entire database or the entire tables, but we, of course, do a original backfill, but afterwards, weâre just taking the data that has changed. And even then, weâre talking about a billion, multi-billion rows every single month. Thatâs not uncommon for transactional systems.
Turner Novak:
Oh, wow.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Think about every time you call an Uber ride, every time you check into a hotel, every time you buy a flight. Every time-
Turner Novak:
Even when you open an app, isnât that getting logged?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yep. Everything is getting logged, every email you send, every message you send, everything is logged. And so, think about how big these transactional systems can be.
Turner Novak:
So if Iâm Uber, I probably have how many different databases and how many different rows might I have if Iâm that scale?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Imagine Uberâs rides table.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Across the US globally, the rides table, each ride that exists in its system.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Thatâs the rides table. That must be massive.
Turner Novak:
And then would they have a different Uber Eats table?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Okay. So itâs a different database.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Mm-hmm.
Turner Novak:
Is it all rides globally in one spreadsheet or in one database or is it different-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Depends how they architected it. Yeah. It can be split up. As your data gets bigger and bigger, some people start sharding their databases. So rides can be sharded into every single month per region is a different shard. And then you can see how this gets even more complicated when youâre talking about streaming that data into a different store for a different use case, let alone in real time.
Turner Novak:
So there may be some cases where you have hundreds of different databases that are all dumping into your central data warehouse?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Do people ever have more than one data warehouse?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Oh, wow.
Jacqueline Cheong:
It is not that common because by default, itâs supposed to be your one centralized data store, but you might have Snowflake for running some AI or ML models, customer facing, maybe not customer facing dashboard, maybe itâs AIML models, your BI reports, your ops team can query that data, marketing, sales will run off of that data. And then you might also use a ClickHouse for observability and logs and hosting your customer facing analytical dashboard. So even within warehouses, there can be different warehouses for different use cases that theyâre better fit for. We also see customers, they might have a Snowflake for their more like BI reporting system, and then they also have a Databricks because their data science team is running ML models there.
Turner Novak:
So how did this market kind of evolve to the point of you have all these different types of databases and data warehouses and also to the point where you guys do real time data streaming. I remember that was kind of a big thing when you started it. How did it kind of get to that point up to when you... I think when you did YC, it was summer of â23?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah.
Turner Novak:
... you started the company. So how did the market kind of evolve and play out?
Jacqueline Cheong:
So this is a very old market. Letâs say some of these timelines are a little bit more made up, but 30 years ago, when it was mostly people would move data between their transactional databases and then move it into Teradata once a month, like a really old warehouse.
Turner Novak:
This is pre-internet, right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
So youâre probably taking a floppy disk and putting in a different computer and dumping it in or something?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Honestly, I donât even know the mechanics of that, but it was physically moving data from one system, downloading it and then moving it over once a month and then maybe your executives would look at it every quarter or reporting would be done there. And then when warehouses went into the cloud, basically technology got better. You could do more things with the data and then you could also store more data, now that it was in the cloud. And so, because you could do more things, there was more use cases and people started moving that data into, letâs say, Redshift.
Turner Novak:
Redshift. Is that Amazonâs?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Amazonâs warehouse was the first cloud data warehouse. And letâs say it was 10, 15 years ago, it was once a week, thatâs probably good enough. Fast forward to today, itâs not uncommon for a company to say, âHey, weâre moving data from all these different systems into our warehouse once every hour.â Thatâs not so surprising anymore because again, technology got better, there were more use cases. People have more data to work with as well and the use cases have also become more common. So itâs once an hour, but then the trend has been very consistent. Itâs consistently going down. And I think whatâs happened over the last couple of years is with this, everyoneâs trying to figure out what to do with AI.
And when youâre building AI or agentic systems basically, systems where software is making decisions on their own autonomously or automating workflows or maybe even interacting with your users without a human in the loop, a lot of companies are now realizing, âOh wow, I need to be able to feed live data into these systems because without a human in the loop, thereâs no human to be like, âOh, I know this. Something happened in the last 30 minutes that you donât have context to. Letâs not push this decision out yet. Itâs just going to make the wrong decisions.â
Turner Novak:
So you basically, in order to build good AI products, you need instant data being collected and used.
Jacqueline Cheong:
100%. If you want it to be pushed beyond a demo or a pilot, you want it to be pushed into production and for it to be running mostly autonomously, it needs to have live context into everything that happened as quickly as possible.
Turner Novak:
And why didnât it... When you think about how the market kind of evolved over time, I remember when I met you, I honestly didnât believe you when you told me real-time data isnât actually really a thing. Why had it not happened? Was it because... Actually, thinking back, we did have LLMs being pretty predominant. It was like the summer of 2023, right? Or was it â22? Iâm trying to remember.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, thatâs when everything really started going.
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
I donât think AI was pushing any of this real-time stuff then. I think it was more companies that have fraud models.
Turner Novak:
So you had a lot of fintech use cases.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Fintech use cases or customer facing dashboards. Imagine you as a customer using a product and thereâs an analytical dashboard that you can see based off of previous actions. Youâve done a bunch of stuff, reconfigured things, youâve launched a new campaign, and then this dashboard shows you nothing. Itâs an hour old, bad user experience and not just bad user experience, but usually in those cases, the customer thinks the product is broken. And so, those use cases were the ones that were dominant. And I think what was... And the AI stuff is more in the recent, Iâd say 12 to 18 months, but why itâs not democratized basically, is itâs a really hard problem to solve. Itâs not like it didnât exist. So there are companies like Netflix, like DoorDash and Instacart, theyâve basically spent many years building out this system in-house.
Turner Novak:
Oh, so they have this technology?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Itâs like you could have streamed data 10 years ago. Itâs just really hard. And theyâve... Usually have a team, maybe five to 10 engineers. Some of them have distributed systems, knowledge. Maybe theyâve done it before. They really understand how to scale this in production. And then you also, after you build the actual data movement pipeline, you have to build the observability, the alerting systems, the monitoring to make sure itâs actually robust. And then failures always happen, right? This is software. How do you recover from failure seamlessly?
So all of these little things, theyâve built out over many, many years, but this is a very painful path. And that was the realization. For someone thatâs starting today, thatâs like, âI need to get real-time data into whatever downstream system.â Maybe itâs a warehouse, maybe itâs a data lake, maybe itâs another database, whatever it is, if I want to do that, do I really need to spend two years... Well, before two years, hire a team, at least a few with distributed systems experience, and then spend two years building. And by the way, the success rate is actually not that high.
Turner Novak:
Yeah, whatâs the success rate? And I remember you told me this.
Jacqueline Cheong:
There was a research paper that actually Confluent put out and it was like the success rate of streaming projects is under 5%.
Turner Novak:
Howâs it so low? Itâs just you should just be able to write some code and connect the connectors and it works.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Thatâs what everybody thinks. Thatâs literally what my co-founder experienced back at his previous companies. It was like, you make a plan, youâre like, âOh, itâs going to take two to three months because we just need these three or four core components and we have a plan and weâre just going to get it set up.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, it might take you a month or two to get a demo, like a pilot setup and it might work. And then you try to go to production and itâs a whole different animal where all those edge cases I talked about in the beginning, âOh no, 1% of the data is dropping. Oh, we read them out of order. Oh, now we have shards. Schema changes have happened to half the shards, but not the other half yet, but we need to reconcile that because weâre merging into one unified table in Snowflake.â Itâs just really complicated stuff and then it never ends. Itâs been almost three years and we are still finding edge cases in different systems as we onboard different customers and everybody has messy data. How can a month be 49?
Turner Novak:
You mentioned that youâve had some teams that have built something in house that have switched over. So I mean, thatâs kind of an interesting, I guess, development, but why... People have already built this, why would they switch over?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Because it doesnât end. The build is not the end of the project. You have to actively maintain it. Youâll find even more edge cases, and then youâll have to patch it, and then youâll have to build the monitors to prevent or observe those edge cases, and then you have to build the failure recovery modes.
Turner Novak:
Yep.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Itâs unending, and then your use cases will change. And by the way, as your data scales and increases by 10X, the same system that worked, may not work anymore because scale will also break the system. And so, what tends to happen with those teams is theyâve built it and theyâre like, âOkay, maybe I can sit back.â And theyâre realizing thereâs someone constantly maintaining and running these pipelines. Maybe then they onboard another database. They basically have to rebuild it to support that new database. Even adding new tables within the same database is not always automatic.
There are manual scripts that companies have to run and then schema changes. So a lot of this stuff is not automated and those companies that have switched over, itâs basically at that point, my team is spending 30, 40% of their time on maintaining and running this pipeline. And we have customer requests, like features, products that we need to build thatâs being pushed out. And so, theyâre just trying to take their time back. This is not their core product and it is actually something that should be commoditized.
Turner Novak:
Should be commoditized because everyone ultimately is building and using the same-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
... connections and data sources that theyâre using?
Jacqueline Cheong:
If youâre moving data from, again, Postgres to Snowflake, just using that just because so many people are using Postgres and Snowflake, does every single company need to figure out that and build that same pipeline? It just seems a little bit backwards.
Turner Novak:
But you still get people that hesitate on, should I actually use a third party provider for this? Whatâs kind of the biggest hesitations that you get?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, thatâs a big one. I mean, with any system thatâs real time, by definition, itâs mission critical. And so, the typical thought is, âWow, this is mission critical, especially in the early days when it was like two of us, no employees.â
Turner Novak:
Are we going to trust this start-up?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. How can we trust this start-up to power our foundational data infrastructure?
Turner Novak:
Because if it goes down, their product canât work, right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And so, that is a very rational fear that people have. And I think, but when you think about it is what we benefit from is one, this is our full-time, this is our product, this is our core product, and we benefit from scale. So working with many different customers with seeing more edge cases than any singular company could, and then dealing with a lot of data complexities in the day-to-day. So itâs basically weâve seen more and weâre able, our software has accommodated for likely more edge cases than any one company can solve themselves. And thatâs why itâs actually a safer option and a faster option to get up and running.
Turner Novak:
I feel like some people might argue that itâs a crowded market. Thereâs just a lot of different data tools and pipeline connectors, et cetera, out there, but you still did it anyways, so why?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I think on the surface, it looks like a very crowded market. Thereâs so many data integration tools, but when weâre talking about the streaming space, and my co-founder actually went through this, when he wanted real-time data in Snowflake, he actually went out to try to buy something first. He initially tried a bunch of the batch players, but obviously, it didnât meet his latency requirements. And the other thing is, he was working at Opendoor and Zendesk, so the scale of data was really big and batch systems just canât keep up in those situations.
Turner Novak:
This is where you dump the entire database in and it syncs and -
Jacqueline Cheong:
No, this is even like, âHey, every hour weâre going to go and find any changes that have happened in the last hour and then move it over.â But imagine now that your company is so big that the amount of transactions that have happened in the last hour is massive. The time it takes to move that data continues to increase at every interval. So thatâs what I mean by batch systems just canât keep up at scale. But then heâs like, âOkay, let me buy a streaming product.â And you know what exists in the market with streaming in particular, is a lot of raw infrastructure. And-
Turner Novak:
So what does that mean?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. The analogy I like to use is, imagine you wanted a wedding cake and what exists in the streaming market is thereâs different types of flour, thereâs different types of salt and thereâs vanilla extract and icing, different types of icing.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then based off, and theyâre like, âOkay, now you go, based off of how many team members you have, do you have a baker amongst your team? Have they baked a wedding cake before?â And then across a period of time, whatever you guys have baked, the quality of that can really vary. Or maybe the wedding cake doesnât even, it completely topples over because you donât have the right team or you donât have the right experience. And thatâs the streaming market, a lot of raw ingredients.
Turner Novak:
So you still have to build it.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Exactly. You have raw ingredients, but you have to build it yourself. And so, we kind of approached it in a very different place. Our assumption is that companies want the outcome that a streaming system provides, which is, I want data faster to pump data into a risk system. I want data faster so my AI agents can get the context they need, but they donât actually care about the infrastructure. So our whole thing is like weâre coming in and weâre like, âForget all the raw ingredients. Hereâs the cake. This is a cake thatâs completely done. Itâs already baked. Just go and eat it.â
Turner Novak:
That is actually what most people would prefer on their wedding day is just, âHey, baker, bake me a cake.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
I donât think anyone bakes-
Turner Novak:
Nobody bakes their own wedding cake.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. So it was taking a very different angle to this space and it seemed to make sense at the time. We were like, âWhy wouldnât people want this?â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. What were some of the biggest product decisions that youâve made over time, like early or even more recently?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I think one very opinionated thing that we did in the beginning was we only focused on databases as a source. Weâve since branched out. We have an events, we can ingest events now and stream it into downstream systems.
Turner Novak:
So this is when it happens in the product, it doesnât go to the database, it goes straight to the data warehouse?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. It hits our events API and this is usually more like web events click streams, this type of data that doesnât need to hit a transactional database. But in the beginning it was like, âWeâre not going to touch any other source. Weâre only going to do databases.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Whyâd you do that?
Jacqueline Cheong:
So that we could be really, really focused because there are maybe 10 really important transactional databases that exist today. And we were like, if we only focus on these very few sources, we can build really, really in depth, focus a ton of time on dealing with these edge cases that typically break the pipelines, and then we can build the best product, the most reliable product. But if we get spread too thin, by definition, youâre trading off on quality. So we were like, âWeâre not going to do anything else.â And we did have prospects that come in, theyâre like, âHey, if you build an integration into Salesforce or Workday, weâll buy your product.â And that was... When you had zero revenue, itâs hard to say no.
Turner Novak:
Did you chase any of those or do any of those?
Jacqueline Cheong:
No, we said no.
Turner Novak:
Oh, wow.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And it was painful, but I think it was the right decision because for the first two, two and a half years, that really was our strength. It was our secret sauce. And for people who tried our product, they were like, âWhoa.â And this is kind of funny because you would think products would work, but theyâre like, âWhoa, what you said in the demo, it actually works.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Yeah, I remember when I invested, when I first met you guys, some of the diligence from engineers was, they had very strong feelings about other products, strong negative feelings, specific words to describe them, but yeah, Artie just worked really well and I actually liked using it. So itâs interesting that thatâs kind of the NPS score of the market, is these visceral reactions from the engineers of not wanting to use the product.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. I mean, itâs actually, I didnât even know this before because I wasnât in the data space before this, but itâs crazy the amount of skepticism that comes in because theyâre like, and this is-
Turner Novak:
It just works. Come on, that canât be possible that this thing just works.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. And actually, theyâll come in, theyâre like, âBy the way, this is the beginning of a discovery call.â Theyâre like, âHey, I just want to let you know Iâm very skeptical because Iâve tried tool one, two, and three, and Iâve been burned by all of them and so, excuse me if Iâm a little skeptical on what you can do.â And then you show them the demo and theyâre impressed, but thereâs still a lot of skepticism. When they try the product, and I always tell people, all those things that broke from before, just give us your hardest tables and your most problematic data. Try to break Artie with it.â And thatâs when they get that reaction like, âWow, you guys werenât kidding. It actually just works.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Itâs kind of like the do hard things, solve hard problems. So basically, you tell your prospects, youâre like, âTry to break it, try to stump us, try to do something that you donât think weâll be able to handle.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
I think another super interesting on the customer front, when you were doing YC, I think thereâs a common YC playbook is sell to other YC companies, people in your batch, whatever.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Thatâs kind of the most common YC playbook. Thatâs how you grow really quickly. What you guys did was the complete opposite of that. So how did you get the first couple customers?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. And by the way, we tend to like to follow YC advice because itâs very practical and very smart. Our problem was, you need to have a decent amount of data for streaming to make sense. And so, most YC companies, especially in our batch, when youâre just starting out, you donât have data problems. And so, we wouldâve loved to sell to our batch, but no one had data problems. And so we couldnât. And so, we had to rely on just cold emails. And so I was just sending, I think during YC, they had this like... Theyâre like, âJust write personalized emails.â This was in the very beginning of AI, so GPT 3.5 wasnât even that good. And so I was just handwriting emails and I had the target to write 20 emails a day.
Turner Novak:
And it was just Netflix, head of data, whatâs their email?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep.
Turner Novak:
Be like, âHey, James.â You just slide in and just say whatever needed to be said?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep, exactly-
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
... like, âHey.â The email to Substack must have been like, âHey, Mike, I noticed that you use Snowflake. Already moves data into Snowflake in near real time and we handle all the hard stuff like schema evolution and merging and everything. Does this sound interesting? Would you want to chat?â And that was the gist of it.
Turner Novak:
And that was your first big customer, right, with Substack?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. That was not even our first big customer. It was our first customer.
Turner Novak:
And it was a big customer though too.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah.
Turner Novak:
It was a pretty sizeable customer.
Jacqueline Cheong:
It was terrifying. I mean, we had only tested our pipeline with maybe a couple thousand rows, which in database land is very, very, very, very tiny. And the moment they wanted to onboard or in the POC, they were like, âYeah, weâre going to start streaming a couple billion rows.â.
Turner Novak:
So were you guys like, âShit, what do we do?â
Jacqueline Cheong:
I mean, yeah, effectively. And then we were like, âWe have to make this work.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And so we obviously, there were a lot of hiccups with onboarding a table that had tens of billions of rows of data in it, but they were very nice about it. They really wanted the promise of what our product could do at the time, and they really helped us go through the hurdles of... I mean, they had very, very strict requirements of how you could connect to the database, how fast you could pull from it, because they wanted to protect their databases, a very reasonable thing to do. That rigor really helped us make our product better. And then actually, the next 10 customers we onboarded after Substack were significantly easier, nowhere near what we had to do to onboard them. But the funny story is with Substack, at that time, I donât even think we really had a UI.
Turner Novak:
Oh, yeah. I remember it was a big deal when you just like, âThere was a dashboard.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. That was a big deal because we didnât have a dashboard when Substack onboarded.
Turner Novak:
So they didnât know if it was working basically? It was like, âThe productâs running, but how do we access it?â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. I mean, they could see it after it landed in Snowflake.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then they could query the data and stuff like that, but-
Turner Novak:
But thereâs nothing telling them that it was working?
Jacqueline Cheong:
No.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Well, what we did, we had a shared Google Doc.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Or a Google Sheet and then they listed out the hundreds of tables that they needed synced over.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then we had a status column.
Turner Novak:
That you would just update?
Jacqueline Cheong:
We would just be like, âThis is backfilling.â
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then when they completed, weâd be like, âNow this is streaming. Itâs done backfilling.â
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And weâd put timestamps on things, but it was just Robin going in there and updating it over multiple days because it takes that long to...
Turner Novak:
To upload them. Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, yeah.
Turner Novak:
And so they still went through with this, even though that doesnât sound like a good user experience, honestly, but it was worth it to get the.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
I mean, it sounds like, was it real time because Robin was manually doing this stuff?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, oh. I mean, the onboarding was absolutely not real time, but once data was streaming-
Turner Novak:
Oh, so this was actually the hookup, the onboarding process?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes. This is the implementation and doing the historical backfill, but then once it caught up, then it was just streaming. And so, the backend infrastructure of all of that actually worked really well, but the UI experience was definitely not there. I mean, it didnât exist.
Turner Novak:
And then you obviously built almost scaffolding, observability alert systems all around that.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep.
Turner Novak:
So then what did you learn about just implementation? Because I know thereâs one customer, itâs actually, I think it was kind of hilarious. Dedicated listeners of the show will remember thereâs an episode with Tommy, the CEO of Alloy, which is one of your customers. Youâre actually in the office implementing Artie while we were recording. And I think maybe thereâs a couple of people that actually remember us having that conversation and we brought you guys up. You were in the office and that was the first time I think you did hands-on, you went to the office.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
And did the onboarding. So how did that come about starting to do that?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. That was different because it was our either second or third implementation of our BYOC offering. So basically, we have our cloud solution where Artie Cloud processes your data and then moves it into, from your databases into your warehouse or data lake. There are a ton of fintech, govtech or just heavy compliance companies where theyâre like, âOur data cannot leave our AWS Azure or GCP environment.â
And so with those, we implement the entire data plane in our customerâs environment so that data processing doesnât have to leave. And this can actually, we actually do a lot of this remotely now because weâve done it enough times, but I think it was more like, it was early, we just wanted to make sure that we had live communication because if we do... I think we went there, we sat next to their security and networking team. It wasnât even actually the team that would use us day to day. It was like, âLetâs get security and networking figured out.â
Turner Novak:
Because it was a big compliance issue.
Jacqueline Cheong:
It was a compliance thing. And so it was like, âHow do we figure out the minimum amount of networking permissions that our data plane thatâs sitting in their environment needed to have to connect?â So it was really honing in on these things and then also making sure the team was comfortable and had someone live to talk to whenever they ran into issues so we could move a lot faster.
Turner Novak:
Because you ran into an issue where their security team just said, âNo, we canât do this and we have to kill the deal,â or something like that.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, yeah. I mean, it never went to the point where they were like, âWeâre going to kill the deal,â but it was like, âHey, we canât do this. We canât do this. We canât do this.â So we were like, âYou know what?â And this was over Zoom and over Slack. Weâre like, âYou know what? Weâre just going to come there and then weâll just go into a conference room together over a couple of days and then weâll tell you exactly what we need. And then you can run the command. We can be next to you and figure all of that out in a couple days instead of like...â You could imagine that dragging out for a month, but we really wanted to make sure that the team that needed this, could get up and running as soon as possible.
Turner Novak:
So you do a lot of this just manual hard product fixes and then you kind of automate them essentially, seems like a big-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep.
Turner Novak:
Itâs like a big part of it.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, yeah. And we do this for actually everything. Itâs not just engineering, but even across marketing or sales, if itâs the first couple times weâre doing something, oftentimes, I will personally just manually do something. Once we realize that it works, we know what the SOP or standard performance is, then weâll create a runbook, automate it, and then itâs much easier for the next, either customer or the next people that need to do this.
Turner Novak:
So I think even now, one of the more interesting things, did you hire a head of growth yet?
Jacqueline Cheong:
No.
Turner Novak:
But youâre looking to or youâre trying to make a growth hire, is that right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
We do not have a growth hire unless... We do have a marketing hire.
Turner Novak:
Okay. And they report to Robin, the CTO, right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, youâre talking about our BizOps?
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Yes. So I would think a marketing person attached to revenue, they would report to the CEO.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
But they report to Robin.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
The CTO.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Why did you do that?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Itâs a hack. So business operations, itâs a pretty loose... Depending on the organization, it can mean different things, but itâs about scaling and optimizing processes. And I think especially today with all of what you can do with AI and even on the go-to-market side, automating with play tables and agentic flows, that is a very technical problem. Theyâre just like, not to confuse with data pipelines, but a different type of pipeline that you would run internally. And so, I actually think, and one of the advice that we got is, itâs a superpower if you treat it as an engineering problem. And so, especially with technical leaders, I think their brains are wired to always optimize.
Turner Novak:
Always try to automate?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
I think itâs an engineering thing. All the best engineers that I know, theyâre just constantly thinking... Theyâll walk into a restaurant. My co-founder will walk into a restaurant. Theyâre like, âEh, they really shouldnât put the seating like this.â And Iâm like, âWeâre just eating.â
Turner Novak:
This is what, Robin will say this?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Thatâs awesome.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Heâs like, âIf they can rearrange this this way, they could put 20% more seats.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Honestly, so sometimes Iâll have that conversation with my wife and sheâs like, âWho cares? Why are you thinking about this at dinner?â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Iâm just like, âWeâre just having dinner.â
Turner Novak:
Well, actually, I remember one time it was, I think you had, oh, it was the new office party. I was talking to Robin once and he was telling me, it was some sort of like, âYeah, Iâve optimized all these things and I donât have to do any work anymore. If I chose to, I wouldnât have to do anything because Iâve automated everything.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
And I was like, âOh, thatâs pretty cool.â Obviously, I think he told me, âItâs done. I donât have to work anymore because Iâve automated every single thing,â and obviously, thatâs not true anymore, but it was a fun story. I just remember him telling me. Heâs automated everything about the job.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep.
Turner Novak:
I think he automated fixing bugs when thereâs a issue with one of the pipelines, he probably had automated a process of doing that.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. We automated a DevOps process every quarter or every half a year, we have to upgrade Kubernetes and a bunch of other stuff across all our data planes. And at this point, between our data planes and all our customers, like BYOC data planes, we have quite a few. So it would literally take someone a week or two weeks every quarter to upgrade everything.
Turner Novak:
Of just manually going into all these different systems and clicking buttons
Jacqueline Cheong:
Literally just upgrading, yeah, following a runbook. And so, we built recently in agentic flow where you just have to... Itâs the same process, right? And AI is great with following runbooks. If you can build something into a runbook, now if someone just presses start and it will create PRs, youâre like, âOkay, great. Do the next step.â And you just watch it do the next step. Wait 15 minutes, see itâs okay, and then do the next step. So weâve automated that, but yeah, having someone whoâs naturally obsessed about optimizing something, run business operations, I think has been the biggest hack for us.
Turner Novak:
Interesting. So you have the ops team report to the CTO
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Because theyâre automating a lot of things.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
And so do you still do a lot of just outbound, a lot of cold outbounding at this point or is it you have a bunch of BDRs maybe? Is it a lot of warm stuff? Whatâs the process still look like?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Itâs a pipeline. So we still do some... Thereâs still some personalized outreach that weâre doing. Itâs highly researched. There are accounts that we think are, we know theyâre dealing with problems that we solve and itâs deep research, learning about the systems that they have, the technographics and whatnot.
But we also have optimized and built a go-to-market engineering pipeline with the tools like Clay and a bunch of other tools that youâve stitched together. And it kind of understands our ICP, the right buyer persona, and this thing is just running autonomously. So weâve basically built a pipeline to replace BDRs and SDRs, and we only have AEs at Artie.
Turner Novak:
Isnât there some of these AI tools like AI BDR? Do you use some of them or you build your own?
Jacqueline Cheong:
We do not use those. And maybe this is like, we should test it because AI is improving so quickly, maybe weâre missing out by not testing it, but we basically built our own internally that... And you know the great thing about this is, itâs so much easier to train because with a lot of SDR, BDR functions, thereâs a lot of like, âHey, letâs make sure we describe Artie properly. Letâs make sure thereâs no typos, grammar is correct. Letâs make sure to remember to follow up to a prospect.â
Turner Novak:
Exactly 24 hours after the call or whatever time-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Or itâs like-
Turner Novak:
... or a certain drip scenario.
Jacqueline Cheong:
A drip, drip scenario. And that stuff AI is great at. It will never drop-
Turner Novak:
Itâll never get that wrong.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. And it will never misspell words or get how to describe Artie because they understand our messaging framework and our positioning. And so youâre really dealing with tweaking the language rather than training more basic stuff.
Turner Novak:
And actually, this is maybe one of my friends whoâs probably one of the best founders at sales Iâve come across, when youâre talking about no typos, he actually showed me that his biggest hack for emailing people is lowercase subject line in the email and also maybe a typo also because-
Jacqueline Cheong:
To show that youâre human.
Turner Novak:
... it knows that itâs AI. It shows itâs actually a real person sending the email. I think the other interesting hack that he has is you get people on iMessage as soon as possible-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, interesting.
Turner Novak:
... because heâs like, âDeals actually close on iMessage, not on email.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Which is kind of interesting. Maybe especially when youâre doing hand-to-hand combat sales. He does pretty, I think itâd be like high ticket ACV, pretty big deals that heâs closing and heâs very much like an iMessage, deals close on iMessage. Have you found that much or?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. I mean, our equivalent is actually just Slack or Teams-
Turner Novak:
Slack or Teams, okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
... like direct the channel between, and weâll pull our engineers into it. And the whole idea is, when you reach out with a question or when thereâs an error, youâre not reaching out to a customer support person that might just be going to the docs and copy and pasting answers and then just giving that answer out to you. Youâre reaching an engineer who can-
Turner Novak:
Fix it.
Jacqueline Cheong:
... who can fix it and also not only tell you that itâs fixed, but explain exactly what went wrong, what we discovered and then how we fixed it. And I think thatâs one of the, actually the best-selling points when we were working with prospects that are like, âThereâs a lot of transparency, you guys are actually helpful.â And yeah, because software is not perfect. There are errors here and there and itâs like how you deal with them and how much transparency you give your customers.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Itâs also too, if youâre emailing, it almost feels like too corporate like, âHi, Jacqueline, it was great meeting yesterday. Iâm following up, blah, blah, blah.â Versus Slack, itâs like, âOh, no, this broke. Can you fix it?â Or whatever. Itâs just more to the point, like a little more casual.
Jacqueline Cheong:
I think the thing, actually what it does is, it makes them feel like weâre an extension of their team because then it branches out. Theyâre like, âHey, weâve decided to build this new feature and weâre curious about what is the best architecture so that we can serve it to our customers for this use case.â And theyâll describe it and I guess itâs outside our scope, normally, but then we will actually go in and maybe do a quick Zoom call or a huddle or something and think through or we can share, âHey, we have another customer that did exact this thing and this was the best architectural pattern to achieve this.â And so, weâre very much an extension of their engineering team.
Turner Novak:
Yeah, and I feel like one of the advantages startups have is, you can over support the customer. Itâs impossible to overinvest in the customer experience. I mean, maybe itâs possible, but just going above and beyond and making people feel good, making it easy to work with you and the different ways to do that, whether itâs you go to their office or you have the Slack connection or you have their iMessage or you have dinner with them more often just or the immediate response, instant response. They Slack you and within two seconds, the bubbles pop up, youâre responding or the name like Jackmanâs typing. I feel like all of those things, it just makes people trust you more and want to work with you.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And people have been telling us for a long time like, âHey, this isnât sustainable. At some point youâre going to become a bigger company and you canât provide this level of support to your customers anymore.â And I actually donât believe that because AWS has great support and theyâre massive.
Turner Novak:
One of the biggest companies in the world.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Exactly. I think itâs just if you intentionally choose to prioritize this, if this is a core part... I think this is a core part of our product actually. And if you believe that and you intentionally try to keep it, you can make it happen because AWS has.
Turner Novak:
Iâve been having the worst experience lately with my health insurance. This is a shout-out. Iâm selfishly saying this, I feel like there needs to be a better startup friendly version of health insurance or insurance. We use this provider in Michigan and I donât know, we mess up the password on our account and Iâve been trying to pay the bill for a month and I canât log in and weâve sat on the helpline multiple times for hours at a time. They canât reset our password and get us into our account to pay. Iâm like, âThis is so...â Itâs like 20% of GDP runs through health insurance, basically.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. If you care about those things as a company, itâs such a hack. Your win rate must triple just from responding to you to help you reset your password. Itâs such an easy thing to do.
Turner Novak:
So if you are making better health insurance, not only will I probably try to buy it, I want to invest in it. I feel like maybe itâs a terrible category. I have no idea, but Iâm like-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Probably. I have no understanding of the health insurance space.
Turner Novak:
But itâs big. I think itâs like an ingredient. You need a big market. Healthcare is a massive chunk of GDP. Thereâs also the other angle of going direct and going around health insurance and just go directly to consumers, building a better product that doesnât incorporate insurance.
Jacqueline Cheong:
It might have been Dalton Caldwell or Michael Seibel that said this to our batch, but itâs like, âIf youâre pivoting an easy way to figure out what to do is find a really, really big incumbent thatâs doing something and all their customers hate them and then just build a better that.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah, find customers who are not happy to have a problem and fix the problem.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Because clearly, itâs a painful enough problem that theyâre still with them.
Turner Novak:
Well, thatâs kind of how you started Artie maybe initially, going back to the beginning.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, it was so painful.
Turner Novak:
So how did that go? Going back to the beginning, whatâs the story there?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, gosh. I guess we have to go six, seven years back, but my co-founder, whoâs also my husband, he used to work at this marketing automation five person YC startup and they were a really small company, but because of the nature of marketing automation, they were dealing with immense scale. So he was figuring out how to build databases that could store billions of rows of data on a daily basis. And then that startup ultimately got acquired by Zendesk. At Zendesk, thatâs when he really learned and used CDC because Zendesk have so many different products.
Turner Novak:
So CDC is change data capture.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Change data capture.
Turner Novak:
Which means?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Which is the way you can grab database changes and get them out of databases.
Turner Novak:
So instead of taking the entire database and copy and paste it, you just say, what has changed and what just-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Exactly.
Turner Novak:
... copy whatâs changed and paste that in.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Exactly. And because Zendesk had so many products, they were basically using CDC to grab all the changes from all the different products and building a unified experience for their customers. So that was really important there. And the scale of which Zendesk was operating at is also important in the history of this. Then he went to Opendoor and thatâs when they really could benefit from getting real-time data into Snowflake because they were such an ops heavy company.
They were buying and selling homes, but every time they bought a home, you have to schedule an inspection, you have to do maybe repainting the walls and then relisting and stuff like that. All the ops people, obviously, you canât have access to the database, all the ops people worked off of Snowflake data. And so the faster that you could get data in, you can imagine one of their key metrics was days on market of the homes. So thereâs a bunch of different factors that go into that, but one of the things is if we can get data in faster and our ops was more efficient, then days on market could theoretically go down.
Turner Novak:
And make more money.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Exactly. And so this was an important project. And then he ended up, I kind of described it a little bit in the beginning, but what he ended up having to do was bake the cake, get all these tools. It was seven or eight engineers at the time building for 11 months to a year. And it was still not fully ready to go into production because of all the edge cases, the schema drift and all that stuff that they had to handle.
And thatâs when he was like, âWow, I am moving data from Postgres to Snowflake. How many other companies need to do this? Do they all have to hire out a team and use these tools to build it out? And do they all spend a year or two doing this? What if this could be a product where I could deploy in like 15 minutes?â Thatâs what he wanted. And so, that was the idea. And when he told me about it, actually I was initially like you. I was like, âAre you sure? Not everybody has real-time data.â
Turner Novak:
That just kind of seems ridiculous. Yeah. Why is that even a problem? It should have been fixed.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. And I trusted him, but I also wanted to verify. So I went out and I talked to a bunch of my friends that worked at different tech companies in the Bay Area and I found out that, wow, it wasnât like a Zendesk specific problem or Opendoor specific problem. This is just how things worked. And then thatâs when I got really excited because it seemed to be a structural problem with how streaming worked today. And there seemed to be this gap that we could fill if this product could, we could build this product. So we decided to jump in and see what we could, see what would happen.
Turner Novak:
And what were you doing at the time?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I was working at a hedge fund called Balyasny. I had been there just over three years, I believe. But I was investing, it was a long, short fund, I was investing in enterprise software companies.
Turner Novak:
And so you kind of understood how software worked as much as a public-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, gosh.
Turner Novak:
... market investor could understand or?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Correct. Yeah. I mean, now I look back and Iâm like, âWow, I really didnât know.â I really didnât understand the technology, but yes, I learned a lot about the business model and what software companies did, what great looks like in terms of financial metrics and stuff like that.
Turner Novak:
You knew what a good software company looked like from the outside, but you didnât know how to make it?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
So what was the decision to actually start a company. When Robin was like, âI want to make this company.â Were you like, âCool, go have fun.â Or were you like, âOh man, I kind of want to join. This seems fun.â How did that evolve?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, it kind of started off like, âI will help you do...â It was very simple. I think part of it was that we were a little naive at the time because it was like, âHey, weâre going to get your data in faster and itâs going to be the easiest thing youâve ever deployed to achieve this. And from a TCO perspective, itâs going to be a lot cheaper.â It sounded like a no-brainer. So our initial thought was like, âHey, weâre just going to build it and weâll tell people weâre building this and people will just buy it.â That was the thought. So Iâm like, âHey, Iâm going to help you set up the company. Iâll do the sales conversations. And you build it.
Turner Novak:
So it was almost like a side project almost as you were thinking about it or was it like, âWeâre going to quit our jobsâ and started working on this?
Jacqueline Cheong:
We quit our jobs.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
We were like, âWeâll quit our jobs, weâll do this.â We just thought it would be easier than it was.
Turner Novak:
The classic just, I mean, nothingâs ever as easy as you think.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Turner Novak:
And you guys did do YC. Was it right in the beginning like, âWeâre starting a company, letâs apply to YC.â Or at what point did YC come into the picture?
Jacqueline Cheong:
No. So funny enough, for whatever reason, I didnât know about YC at all, had never heard of them. I was really not in the startup space. So we quit our jobs, Robin started building. I was like, âI need to buy a book to learn how do people do sales.â
Turner Novak:
What book?
Jacqueline Cheong:
So I was reading, I think it was Foundings Sales, that was the book, by Pete Kazanjy? Really good book for someone that had absolutely no understanding of how to do sales. So I was reading that book and I was getting the business, the admin stuff set up. I tried to email a bunch of people to have conversations to see if they would be interested in the product. And thatâs what I was doing.
And I didnât know what the ICP was or the buyer persona. So it was a really broad category of people that I was going after. So what Iâm trying to say is, I really didnât know what I was doing. And then at the time, I happened to see one of my college friends post on LinkedIn that he was doing YC and he was starting his own company. So I actually just reached out to grab lunch and to learn more. And at lunch heâs like, âOh, you should apply to YC.â And heâs like, âIf you apply and you get in and if you donât do it, youâre an idiot.â
Turner Novak:
Thatâs how he described it?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Thatâs just how he was... And heâs like, âYou should apply. And then if you get an interview, I will... Text me and Iâll tell you how the interview goes.â
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
So yeah. So then I just did it and I was like, âWell, who knows if weâll get in?â Because he was like, âThe acceptance rate is really low.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah, itâs 1%. I was talking to Garry. I talked to him yesterday. The episode will come out in a couple weeks after people are hearing this probably, but yeah, heâs like, â1% of application approval rate.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. So I was just like, âOkay, whatever. Weâll just submit an application and weâll decide if we get it.â And this is a very YC thing, but when they accept you, they ask you on the call-
Turner Novak:
If youâre going to take it, right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. And obviously, itâs a little bit of a knee-jerk reaction, but I was like, âYes.â And then after-
Turner Novak:
Because your friend was like, âYouâre an idiot if you donât do this.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. And I was just like, âOkay, I just said yes.â And then after the call, I remember I turned around and I was like, âRobin, was that okay? I said yes. So like I guess weâre doing this. Right?â And heâs like, âYeah, itâs fine.â
Turner Novak:
Okay. And then how did that go, the whole process of doing YC for someone whoâs never done it before?
Jacqueline Cheong:
It was great. It was great. It was such a great learning experience. I spent the whole batch just learning to sell. And because we had spent six months before roughly just building the product... And data infrastructure tools, it takes a bit of time to build. So thank God we actually had that six month lead time and I spent the whole batch really just selling the product, which I think helped a lot.
Turner Novak:
You didnât have to go zero to one on the first sale in the 13-week YC batch. You were able to go zero to 0.8 or something, and then you go 0.8 to one through the course of YC. Something like that.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, yeah. Yeah, exactly.
Turner Novak:
So you said you spent the whole time learning sales. How did you evolve your thinking? What did you learn through YC or even through today? What have you learned about sales?
Jacqueline Cheong:
So I guess itâs very specific depending on your ICP and the buyers that youâre selling to, but mostly what I learned was how to sell to a technical audience that doesnât like to be sold to, tends to be more skeptical and how do you win their trust? I think thatâs the big lesson. And then this might sound like really basic stuff, but how do you do a great discovery call? How do you-
Turner Novak:
How do you?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I mean, I think thereâs a bunch of frameworks out there, but how do you make sure youâre asking the right questions? And that depends on your product, but the goal of the discovery call is like, âDo they have pain?â A very simplistic thing is like, âDo they have pain and is already appropriate or overkill for what they want to do with their data?â
Turner Novak:
And youâre basically finding out, is this someone who might become a customer relatively soon?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. And when they become a customer, are they going to be happy? And I think you can gauge that within the first conversation, but itâs learning to actually not sell and ask a ton of questions and understanding where to dig deeper to unveil either pain or what outcomes they really want.
Turner Novak:
So itâs a discovery call or discovery portion.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Mm-hmm.
Turner Novak:
How would you take it a step further?
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then you do your demo call.
Turner Novak:
And you donât demo on the first call?
Jacqueline Cheong:
We donât. We kind of explain what the product does on a high level, but the first call is really just to understand their situation, their challenges and their pain. And I think it might feel a little bit weird, but it is very much for us to truly understand them, such that the rest of the process, they can learn to trust us a little bit more because then everything else is catered from that. And you never stop doing discovery. When you do your demo, you do deeper discovery. When you meet again, every time you meet, the rule of thumb is, you should always find out something new about your customer.
But then itâs building out the rest of the process. After the demo, do we do a technical deep dive with their DevOps and platform and infra teams before we do a POC? How do you run a POC? What do they need? What type of checkpoints do they need mid and end of trial? How do you talk about pricing? All of that and how to multi-thread across different stakeholders and when to do that and when not to do that. Those are all things that Iâve had to learn over the last few years.
Turner Novak:
What was the one you, of all those areas, what was the area you sucked at the most or the place you feel like youâve improved the most and learned the most on?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Probably the discovery call.
Turner Novak:
Oh, really?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I think thatâs the most important call.
Turner Novak:
So did you just not do that? Did you just jump in too quickly and not get to know what they were thinking about?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Probably in the first... Yeah, definitely in the first couple of months, but itâs about the first 20 minutes you meet someone, maybe itâs actually even less. The first five to 10 minutes of meeting someone, how do you effectively make them trust you? And theyâll trust you in that moment if they feel like you understood them. And the only way you can understand them is to ask good questions and then dig deeper in areas that they care about.
I think that takes a lot of knowledge around the technicals, knowing the nuances. And when someone... Someone can tell you a hundred different things. How do you narrow down to the five things that actually matter and dig deeper? I think that takes... It took me a while to get to that point. And then you know what? The other thing is, how do you provide an insight that they didnât even ask for after hearing everything they want to achieve?
Turner Novak:
So why is that important, providing an insight? Does it make it-
Jacqueline Cheong:
Because you can be a thought partner to them and it helps with the trust. Itâs like, âHey, not only did you take the time to fully understand the challenges that Iâm facing, now youâve understood it well enough and then have thought of something else that I havenât thought of before and I think you could actually help me as I think about this new use case that Iâm going to do.â So for example, someoneâs like, âHey, I am currently using another...â I have a Postgres database and Iâm using another Postgres database as an analytical warehouse use case. Itâs not meant for it, but I am doing that for now because it was an easy decision at the time.
And one thing, instead of just focusing on, âYeah, we can move data between Postgres and Postgres, we could do this. This is how you set up Artie. What else do you have?â Itâs like, âOh, well, I know this works fine for now. If your data 100Xs or 1,000Xs over the course of the next year or two, have you thought of what youâre going to do because that warehouse is not going to hold? Where are you going to migrate it? What are your use cases? Is Snowflake the best one? Is Databricks the best one for your use case or should you actually be upgrading to a ClickHouse and helping them walk through... It wasnât even what they asked, but itâs helping them walk through what the future could look like.
Turner Novak:
So itâs almost like consulting a bit of like, help them with problems, even if itâs unrelated to Artie, it sounds like.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yep. Yep. I think itâs all enterprise sales is consultative and getting to that level where you can have a really good understanding and then consult, takes a lot more experience.
Turner Novak:
We havenât even talked about this until now. You just announced as of, well, weâre recording this, youâre going to announce it tomorrow, but when this came out, itâll be a couple of days ago. You just announced, you raised Series A. So what did you just announce and what are you doing now?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. So we raised a Series A led by Standard Capital. So itâs Dalton Caldwell, Paul Buchheit and Bryan Bergâs Series A fund.
Turner Novak:
And they were partners at YC for a very long time.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes, for a very, very long time. And they have a very deep understanding of actually developer tools. So weâre really, really excited to partner with them and for them to be a thought partner as we grow and scale or go to market. But with the funding, weâre really excited because we are going to invest even deeper into the core infrastructure. We already started, but weâre going to expand our integrations to other sources and destinations where real time matters and then obviously, growing the team. So weâre hiring across engineering, sales, BizOps, support, marketing across the company, to help us achieve our mission faster.
Turner Novak:
And so I think it might be interesting for people to hear more about Standard Capital. I feel like at this point thereâs been a couple announcements. People are like, âOh, interesting.â Because I feel like when they first came out with it, there was like a, âI wonder if any founder will work with them or what type of founders will work with them.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Really? Okay.
Turner Novak:
Well, it was a new model, right?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes, yes.
Turner Novak:
So whatâs the model that they do thatâs kind of different from maybe the other Series A funds that you talked to?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. So number one, itâs an application. So itâs very similar to YC, very different questions, but itâs an online-
Turner Novak:
Itâs the same vibe, kind of.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. All the questions are online. You put in your application, you have to tell them how much you want to raise from them, at what valuation. And then, they ask you a series of more post product market fit questions. It was very different from the YC questions. And the whole thing, I think, literally lasted just under two weeks. So you submit the application by whatever deadline they have. You get a first interview thatâs 20 minutes, which is double... YC was 10 minutes, so this is double the length. And then if you make it to the second round, theyâll meet you in San Francisco for a 45-minute second round meeting where youâll go much more in depth into your business and how you think about certain things, and you meet the three of them with your co-founder. And then literally, I think it was the next day or the day after, you find out if you got in.
Turner Novak:
And they just give you a yes or no, basically?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Pretty much. Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Because itâs definitely different from... How would you describe the Series A process with other funds you were talking to? How was that so much different?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Well, I was told the average Series A process can be three to six months. Is that right?
Turner Novak:
Maybe. Yeah, it just depends.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, it depends. And you have to do, get warm intros.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. They wonât talk to you unless you get introduced by someone.
Jacqueline Cheong:
It is a little bit weird.
Turner Novak:
Yeah.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. You have to do a warm intro. I was actually sitting there. I was like, âDo I need a warm intro to someone that I already know?â
Turner Novak:
That Series A investor that youâre meeting, they donât have an application, but thereâs 50 people that they might meet and they get, weâll just say in one day, Iâm exaggerating this a little bit, but thereâs 50 potential warm intros, but 20 of them, two people mentioned it. And for four of them, three people, and thereâs one Series A company that six people were like, âHey, have you met blah, blah, blah yet?â
So when youâre just squaring that up and youâre doing meetings all day and calls all day, youâre like, âAh, six people told me I should meet these guys, this one, only one person. And I highly value these six people and Iâve never actually met this one person before or I met them 18 years ago when we worked at Yahoo together.â So when you just kind of think about how theyâre trying to figure out, Iâm going to spend time on things, six people that I trust said I should meet this founder. So maybe thatâs the one that I will pick and prioritize.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
So it can be really hard to fight through the noise.
Jacqueline Cheong:
So yeah, you spend basically a little bit of time, you have a spreadsheet and youâre like, âThis investor, who are all the people that know them?â And then you go through each one and youâre like, âWhich one is the best one to ask for an warm intro?â And then anyway, you finally get the warm intro and maybe you do a coffee chat.
Turner Novak:
And they might say like, âJacqueline, great to meet you, adding Anna to find time to chat next week or in two weeks,â or something.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Mm-hmm. Yep, yep. And maybe itâs a coffee chat, maybe itâs a Zoom call. And then you just donât... The process is different across funds. So it can be two, three meetings, it can be six, seven, eight meetings until you get to an answer, and it can be one to two weeks between meetings. Who knows? Itâs just a lot more of a black box and it goes on for a lot longer. Standard is just like a... Thereâs a formula that they follow and they actually follow it. It actually is after the deadline within two weeks, everybody knows, itâs a yes or a no. And you donât have to...
Turner Novak:
Wonder.
Jacqueline Cheong:
You donât have to wonder, oh, thatâs the other thing. If a VC says no, itâs probably just, theyâll just ghost you.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Thatâs true.
Jacqueline Cheong:
So itâs not a hard no, so you have to deduce that and figure it out.
Turner Novak:
And then randomly three weeks later theyâll be like, âOh, hey, I was on vacation, but we should catch up.â And itâs just because you got a term sheet from someone else.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. And so, but you could say, these are just kind of three guys, no oneâs heard of them before. Thereâs some funds that they have a bunch of people on the team that will help you and theyâll join your board.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Mm-hmm.
Turner Novak:
How did you feel like Standard Capital matches up against maybe what you might get from a board member who will show up to your meetings and add all this value to you, and they have a platform team with all these people that will help you?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
How did you think through that?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Very different. So thereâs no board. They donât take a board seat. What they do is, every quarter, you do group office hours.
Turner Novak:
This is with other, because they do batches, right? Itâs like, we funded six companies in a batch kind of.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes. So every quarter theyâll fund around five or six companies and then each quarter theyâll, I think presumably theyâll move people around, but youâll have a group of founders where youâre doing your board meeting too.
Turner Novak:
So itâs just a bunch of other founders come to your board meeting?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Mm-hmm. And the idea is, you learn a lot faster when you hear about other companies that are roughly in the same spot. What are the challenges that theyâre facing? How are they thinking about solving it? Because youâre probably like, itâs similar-ish problems.
Turner Novak:
So have you gone to some other board meetings now or not yet?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, yeah. Weâve done one so far. It was with the entire group because it was just the first cohort.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Did you all do all your board meetings all at the same time?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Okay.
Jacqueline Cheong:
You literally go up one by one and you present your, you have 10 minutes to present, what are your challenges, what do you need help on? And then we all talk about it together. And yeah, I mean, I donât know what a normal board meeting looks like, but I thought that was really helpful because we all are roughly the same, having the same problems.
Turner Novak:
So itâs all different products and maybe industries and markets, but weâre all working on the same types of things?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Itâs like, how do we build a team? How do we do... Weâre all hiring salespeople now. How are you thinking about that? What does marketing look like for all our different companies? The things that you donât think of pre-product market fit that is necessary now, weâre all working together and brainstorming. And then we all have a Slack channel and you can talk to all three of them whenever you need advice. You can choose to do recurring monthly chats with Dalton or something like that. And because their whole model is like, âWe donât need to be on your board to be helpful. We can just be helpful.â
Turner Novak:
Yeah. Iâve always had this weird personal feelings about for my strategy, do I need to be a board member or whatever? And thereâs also like, man, that kind of seems like a pretty big burden of like, got to be on the board of a company. Iâm on the board of one company and in one aspect, I donât do anything. I just text the founder a lot, but I donât actually do anything. Youâre on the board and you have to sign and approve things. You have to read a document. And we do board meetings, but theyâre not... Itâs on Zoom at this point. Itâs like one of those things, it sounds really daunting and like you do a ton, but also, you donât really do anything at the same time. And you donât necessarily have to be on the board to do the same things.
Jacqueline Cheong:
That was what I was going to bring up. If you werenât on the board, can you still do all those things that you do as a board member?
Turner Novak:
I have your phone number and we just text about random things.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes.
Turner Novak:
Maybe if I was like a board member, thereâd be more pressure of, you have to actually do the thing.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Oh, like proactively text.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. But I donât know. I feel like I do try to, when you do ask for something, I do try to help as much as I can, but also, what context does an investor have of the business to truly actually help? Thereâs maybe a couple cases where you can actually move the needle like, âHey, trying to do a podcast to announce a Series A, can I come on your podcast?â Maybe thatâs a place I can actually tangibly move the needle, but also youâre like, thereâs always recruiting. Everyoneâs like, âOh, we help with recruiting.â
And I think thereâs, maybe you sit down with them and think through what a process might look like or maybe itâs we have a recruiter on the team that works with you or I know someone who maybe could be a good fit and Iâll just convince them they should join. Iâll help you sell it to them. Or maybe sometimes I see that the investor will try to help close the candidate that the founder and the team worked on. So thereâs all these different elements of ways you can kind of help with things, but again, you donât have to actually be on the board.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. I mean, our best investors, they all help with customer intros. Like you said, we have a candidate way down the funnel. We gave them an offer. Weâre competing against this other offer that they have from a startup. Yeah, can you talk to some of our investors? And those are all very helpful things and referrals. I think an investorâs network is probably one of the most helpful things there. And then pattern matching, right? If you guys have invested in 100,000, maybe not 100,000 companies, but 10,000 companies, you can kind of tell us what path weâre... Weâre thinking about doing this and youâre like, âOh, Iâve seen this fail 99 times out of 100 and this is exactly why this doesnât work out.â Itâs still good context to have. We may still decide to do it because weâre a little different from that context, but itâs good context to have so you go in eyes wide open.
Turner Novak:
Yeah. That seems to be the value prop of YC is like, âHey, weâve actually had three YC companies that did exactly the same thing, and you can talk to the founders of why they failed or someone actually did figure this out, talk to them and see what they can do to help.â
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
So maybe last question, do you have a favorite founder, CEO, or business that youâve learned a lot from or gotten inspiration from just when it comes to building Artie?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes. I think one of the best... Heâs no longer alive. Heâs an author. One of the best books Iâve read in the last couple of years is, The Score Takes Care of Itself.
Turner Novak:
Iâve heard of that before, but who wrote it?
Jacqueline Cheong:
So I believe someone had to take over and write it for him because he passed away, but he was the coach for the 49ers and it was during a period of time when the 49ers were doing a really terrible job.
Turner Novak:
This is Bill Walsh?
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yes. They were the worst team in the NFL for multiple seasons. And he took over and within, I think it was within two seasons, they won the Super Bowl.
Turner Novak:
Wow.
Jacqueline Cheong:
And then they continued to win the Super Bowl for many years after. And itâs his philosophy of how he ran his team and his standard of performance and how he implemented it. And a lot of it is directly translatable to running a business.
Turner Novak:
What were the biggest takeaways from the book?
Jacqueline Cheong:
I mean, the biggest, biggest takeaway is the title. Itâs like, the whole thing is about if you just focus on everything that you can control and you make sure that every single person on your team is performing to the highest standard of performance and you have your standard of performance strictly written out for everybody. It was not just the players, not just the coaches, but up to the people, like the janitors that worked in that building had a standard of performance. And if you control all of the inputs that you can control and you do a really good job, you donât have to care about the outcome. The outcome will just happen.
Turner Novak:
And thereâs a lot of takeaways obviously for building a company with that.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah. Yeah. Itâs focusing on all the most important things, focus on what you can control. Donât think too much about whether or not this deal closes or this product is... If you focus so much on doing all the right things and youâve done work that youâre proud of, at the end of the day, you donât have to think about whether or not it was a good or bad outcome. And then in the long run, itâs almost for sure that youâre going to have a good outcome rather than a bad one.
Turner Novak:
Oh, makes sense. Well, Iâll throw a link in the description for the book if anyone wants to read it.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah.
Turner Novak:
Well, this a lot of fun. Thanks for coming on the show.
Jacqueline Cheong:
Yeah, thank you for having me.
Stream the full episode on YouTube, Spotify, or Apple.
Find transcripts of all other episodes here.